New York Attorney General Races: Historical Trends

Analyzing 25+ Years of Political, Regional, and Demographic Change

Cycles of Party Control

  • Late 1990s-Early 2000s: Highly competitive; Republicans still strong in suburbs/upstate, Spitzer’s 1998 win narrow.
  • 2002-2010: Rapid urbanization and demographic drift push AG races toward safer Democratic margins, but suburbs not fully locked.
  • Post-2010: Double-digit Democratic wins become the norm except during national “red wave” cycles.

Regional and Demographic Shifts

Region/Group199820102022Pattern
NYC core~55% Dem~62% Dem~61% DemConsistent, urban lock
Suburban (LI/Westchester)Near even splitStrongly DemCompetitive, Dem edge narrows (2022)Most sensitive to national shocks
Upstate/ruralStrong GOPGOP, Dem growth in citiesGOP dominant, some Dem urban holdsPersistent divide
Asian/Orthodox/LatinoSmaller, Dem-leaningGrowing, Dem-leaningSwing/influx points in select boroughsRising influence, not uniform

Partisanship and Third-Party Vote

  • 1998-2006: Third parties accounted for 3-5%+; more space for ticket-splitting and protest votes.
  • Post-2010: Third-party shrinking (often less than 2%); increasing straight-ticket and polarization.

Issue-driven Wild Swings

  • Crime Surges: Drive GOP spikes in outer boroughs, Long Island, select upstate regions (notably 2022).
  • Scandals/Oversight: AGs benefit from high-profile investigations when running on reform/anti-corruption platforms (e.g., against Wall St/Trump/NRA/Washington).
  • Economic Distress: Suburbs and exurbs the “swing lever” in economic downturn, with depressed city turnout tightening the race.

Mobilization and Turnout Effects

Turnout Share By Region

  • High NYC turnout: Correlates with Dem blowouts (e.g., 2018, anti-Trump wave years).
  • Low city/minority turnout: Allows GOP to compete, especially amidst high upstate/suburb mobilization.

New and Emerging Trends

  • Asian and Orthodox Jewish Bloc: Now a key swing group in carefully targeted precincts; their swing outsized vs. raw vote share.
  • Nationalization Down Ballot: AG races increasingly about national themes (Trump investigations, SCOTUS, gun rights) rather than just state issues.
  • Erosion of Ticket-Splitting: Down-ballot candidates rise/fall with the party's top-line turnout and enthusiasm.

Timeline and Predictive Patterns

  1. Late 1990s: Margins close, NYC/suburbs not fully Dem locked.
  2. 2002-2010: Suburban shift, third-party relevance, city turnout rising.
  3. 2010-2022: Democratic dominance, national issue surges (crime, scandals) cause compression, not reversal.
  4. Present: Turnout and suburbs as bellwethers; only “perfect storm” (crime, scandal, economy) can meaningfully threaten Dem hold in normal cycles.

Data compiled from 25 years of NY AG election data, public records, and political analysis.

NYS Attorney General Races: Historical Patterns

NYS Attorney General Races: Historical Patterns